Game #1123 Tournament game#2 | Round 1 : 3vs3 PBEM TEAM TOURNAMENT 2018 #2
Badok
vs
El_Lobo
vs
$eeR
vs
Fluksen
vs
Zytozid
vs
AlXStormrage
Match Details
| Played: | 2019-12-23 |
| Rating | 2 - Nice Game |
| Amount of Humans: | 6 |
| Kind of Report: | 3vs3 PBEM TEAM TOURNAMENT 2018 |
| Kind of game: | PBEM |
| Game-value: | 75 |
| Result | Player | Classes | Races | Team | Points | Extra Points | Missed Points | Quitter | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Badok | Rogue | Humans | 2 | 80 | 40 | 0 | here | |
| 1 | El_Lobo | Necromancer | Tigrans | 2 | 15 | 0 | 0 | here | |
| 1 | $eeR | Sorcerer | Dwarves | 2 | 16 | 0 | 0 | here | |
| 2 | Fluksen | Archdruid | Halflings | 1 | 0 | 0 | -32 | here | |
| 2 | Zytozid | Warlord | Dwarves | 1 | 0 | 0 | -44 | here | |
| 2 | AlXStormrage | Theocrat | Draconians | 1 | -23 | 0 | -40 | here |
Confirmed by Zytozid
Well, it's a vet+beginner's tournament but let's be real: Our enemy's team doesn't really have any beginners. I wish the team setup would have been done more balanced and this is also what I commented about when the teams were first created but it is how it is. I'd bet 50 Euros that this team will not lose one of its matches in this tourney if they play seriously.
That being said it was a good and fair game and I thank everyone for participiating!
Confirmed by $eeR
Written by $eeR
Skuns was in this game ?
wow we must be really good to win 3v4 ...jk
yeah that was an important battle , giving you my rather large vassal on the northern island behind my capital seemed like a wise precaution.
good job guys ....on to the final
Written by El_Lobo
Thank's for thr match guys! I think the game changing battle was this one between AIX and me.
If I would have lost the battle all the exalteds would have been alive and as a necromancer I did not have any suitable counter against them. Seer and Badok would have helped me and then there would have been no defenders against Fluksen's invading T4 serpents and concealed shamans. A lot of "if's" but we'll never know what would have happened if...
After this battle I retreated and focused on supporting Seer with Man a and Badok with gold. Their troops seems to be way better to defend against flying exalted stacks than mine but the attack I expected did not come. Seer's eco was weakend after he gave me a big city to move my throne and Badok did a really good job in the meanwhile. After we repelled Skun's T4 serpents and shamans our team was in a clear advantage. Thank's again to all participating players!
EDIT: Not Skuns, I meant Fluksen! :-)
Confirmed by Fluksen
Aye, thanks for the match. That's the plan, @Fluksen, will win this - hopefully sometime next decade
About the screenshots: I was asked by Skuns not to share them while judges were discussing them. I suppose it's alright now that the game has been resolved and everybody can check the score in game: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1WNdEUDE4bOYq77pCxprRRj1DrhKdUmxv
Congratulations $eer, Badok and Lobo
Thanks for the game @everyone & good luck in the finals, now that you beat us I hope you at least win the thing.
Is there a chance the score screens are posted here? would like to know how gigantic the difference was in the end (pretty pretty big I guess)
Thanks for timely response. I have to notice that AlX didn't do anything, so you have to do all instead of him.
You should follow the instructions below. And send screenshots to all judges by PM. But, since you are the first in the turn order, I need to ask you to take screenshots of all scores 2 times: at the end of the previous turn and at the start of the current turn. Use for it the turn slider for each score screen.
How's the judical process going? Have the screenshots been gathered? I got my turn a few hours ago, should we continue with the match?
If AlX didn't, perhaps I should prepare screenshots of the scores? I'm first in the turn order, so as long as I don't take any action, results should be identical (sans one turn of my research).
1) The strategic turn is played until the last player in the turn order
2) That player plays his turn, saves & quits, copy the save game to a backup folder
3) That player re-enters the game and surrenders, then takes screenshots of all the scores (general, domain, research, military, happiness). He does NOT end the turn. Instead he quits the game without ending the turn.
4) He sends the screenshots to judges
5) Judges check the scores and take a decision
I hope AlX can do that without problems (as veteran player, of course). If you can't by any reasons, please don't keep silence. Even if you're busy let me know and we'll find an acceptable solution.Â
P.S. I'm on vacation now till 17-th of December, so there may be some delays. Sorry for that. Please, for all of you: don't worry and not in a hurry to leave this session until judges final decisionÂ
But don't forget that such important things should be resolve by judges only. So you should let me, or other judges, know about this problem. Of course, if both teams will agree to finish this match then we will do it. But you can't do it without reporting about it to the judges.Â
P.S. We can't let anarchy to ruleÂ
We have a crushing economic advantage over you (at the end of my turn 56, it's 27-9 controlled cities, counting vassals and recent captures). You're running out of mana (dunno about Black, but Green and White have ~250 together). We're freely roaming your territories, burning and capturing cities left and right while you're unable to either repel us or respond in kind, and we have a serious vision and logistic advantage. We can - and will - wear you down bit by bit.
I'm not trying to be a dick here. I know you still have armies left and you're not in a completely hopeless position, but let's be honest - unless we perform a major string of dumb decisions, it's unlikely for you guys to make a comeback at this point.
Now, this is not much of an argument, but I think we took long enough. It's time to close this game up and move on to round two.
whoever hosted the game please enable the turn timer now. This game annoys me atm. Skuns said it and it's in the rules. I do not have a problem disabling it while someone is on vacation or has serious private problems but no one has given a feedback for those reasons.