1. Home
  2. AOW3 Players
  3. Result
LAST MONTHS

0

TOTAL

Game #124 | Skuns vs xlnt

xlnt vs  Skuns453Lirik902


Match Details

Played:2016-01-24
Savegame
Rating 2 - Nice Game
Amount of Humans:2
Kind of game:   PBEM
Game-value: 38
Result Player Classes Races Team Points Extra Points Missed Points Quitter Rate
1 xlntArchdruidDraconians126130here
2 Skuns453Lirik902RogueHalflings200-23here
Posts to the game:

Here's a screenshot of my defeat in this session: Lose

user
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

why is this game still in ongoing games? we both reported it... i believe

i just can't use this site );
user
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

Confirmed by xlnt
gg
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

To xlnt
It was undoubtedly an excellent game from you <smiletext23>
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

The report of this session is here.
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

124 | Age of Wonders 3
Here's a screenshot of my defeat in this session: Lose
Back to the game page
user
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

Have i ever mentioned that this site has abysmally awful design - i may have reported Skuns to be the winner, not that i care much (:
user
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

My economy was very bad, but i used some bandits to boost my moral (let them take your town and liberate it for 400 morale for 15 turns). I had all the gold/mana i needed from your towns - when i pillaged them i got like 400gold and a lot of mana (;

It's nice to chase around the map - makes me think and train, so i don't mind (:

good game and i'm ready for the next when you are
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

To xlnt
But now I see - it is the end. I have no reason to fight. And at the next turn it will be a great battle with a known ending <smiletext1>
I didn't begin to look for a salvation at the underground again. And it was my mistake <smiletext6>

P.S. I'm sorry that this session lasted longer than necessary for a few last turns.
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

To xlnt
I will not surrender until I have at least one unit <smiletext0> , but it looks like you have won <smiletext23>
You have built a great army, but for me it is a mystery inside of your economy. You have 3 cities around the starting point (including your capital), but only one of its is your own.
Forest robbers (neutral roamings/bandits) pay extra to you, that you do not attack their spawn sites? <smiletext1>
It was good experience for me. <smiletext18>
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

To xlnt, Hiliadan
Hi. Returning to the discussion of the map's difficulties, perhaps, I  have understood what is its effect. It seems that the Emperor-difficulty affects the power of the neutral units guarding the Item Racks. At this session I have found one Item Rack with 5 Human Knights guarding it.   Who knows what powerful artifacts stored there <smiletext1>
Although I still do not exclude that the Emperor-difficulty also affects the possibility of merging the two groups of neutral roamings into one army 
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

Yes, there are no necromancers at this session. It's sad for me  
There is no place for ghoul-creativity <smiletext6> <smiletext1>
user
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

hey - thanks for the note and no problem (:

i like our games - i wonder how you are going to get out of this one - no necromancers for you i hope :S
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

I apologize for the delay of my next turn. I was busy for work and, unfortunately, I didn't have enough time for all sessions <smiletext6>
user
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

interesting topic for a test or/and maybe a question to the .dev(s).

i have a bandit camp with a tier3 unit in it! so maybe, just maybe - Skuns has a point, i never saw a turn 4-5 bandit camp with a shadow elemental in it before but i only play normal defenders strength and Emperor AIs
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

To Hiliadan
In my opinion this is unlikely. Otherwise, when a player chooses into opponents the AI-Squire and one sets the difficulty settings as Emperor there, he will meet with the AI-Emperor.   Then he would be out of luck.   
I've never tried it, but I've seen on one map the AI-Lord, who was living from the session's start, and AI-emperor, who had remained from the real player. Their aggressiveness was different, according to their level of AI. And it does not depend on the difficulty of the map, otherwise their aggressiveness would be  approximately equal.
I believe that the difficulty of the map affects the number of units bandits / roamers, which are born in hostile shelters. And perhaps it influences the periodicity of their occurrence from there. As you know, this number of units shows the power of such troops.   :'(
user
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

Yes, Skuns, that's what I'm talking about also.
The difficulty chosen at the beginning is the difficulty of the AI as far as I know. So if there is no AI, it's irrelevant.
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

To Hiliadan
There is not any AI at this session, including AI-Emperor.   Here we are  talking about the difficulty of the map, which was selected at the beginning (see xlnt' screen)   <smiletext1>
user
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

As far as I know, Emperor AI only affects the AI players, not the independents.
user
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

Emperor difficulty matters when there are no AI? Sorry - never knew, i just always play like that on single player and the game remembers the player's settings );

we'll just circle the map and play with no towns anyway :p~
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

I've joined. But it's too much for me to make a session difficult - Emperor.
I think that neutral bandits/roamers eat our armies for 10 turns.   It will be a game of survival, not a struggle between the two teams 
user
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

game up
game is up, pass 1225

game name: xlnt's game (i was in a hurry..)

screen1

screen2

screen3

screen4
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

By the way, I have the official version of the game with all updates. No Beta. But some bugs yet still exist at PBEM at least in Steam-version <smiletext6>
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

I've just done it. Now I'm waiting your screenshots <smiletext0>
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

What?
I've gaming through Steam client. Maybe the  problem occurred because of this?
Let's try another way: I deleted this session and you will recreate it again
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

The game
I wanted suggest to you creating this map too. <smiletext0>  But you didn't say any words about it earlier and I've thought you not wanted to do it  <smiletext6>  Sorry for this little misunderstanding and for my initiative and quickness <smiletext1>
Good luck you too with the game  and let the empires will rise
user
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

When i started my turn the game says my version is not compitable - are you using some beta version?
user
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

i wanted to make the game but you're so fast (; anyway - i did try to create a game, made all screenshots and i checked and you did the same so i'm happy i didn't miss anything

let's go - good luck and have fun
user
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

Skuns vs xlnt
All map settings according to the rules of the PBEM tournament.
Its screenshots will be posted later
Back to the game page
user
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

InformationSkuns vs xlnt
xlnt joined !!
Published on Thu, 01 Jan 1970 01:00:00 +0100

xlnt
There are screenshots: Screen1 ,  Screen2 ,  Screen3 ,   Screen4 ,   Screen5
Because of the holidays Turn timer is Off. But I think we don't need to put it On.
Forse high speed tactical combat is On.
Password - 6723